The classes responsible for locking the screen are in, which is in the system / framework. I am one of those conservatives who have been sitting on the stock firmware (2.3.6) for 2.5 years, so I studied the corresponding sources. I started by using one of the advantages of Android - from studying the source. This voice is probably right, and many locker developers, and I (modesty did not allow myself to be assigned to them) had to invent a bicycle, and not one. To be more precise) did so for security reasons. Lockscreen (in Android it is called keyguard) just raises questions: why didn’t Google deal with it, since with launchers, why didn’t they make a dialogue with all the lockers available on the device and with the ability to select the default one? Somewhere deep in the brain, in a quiet, indecisive voice, someone answers: maybe Google (Android Ink. What can I say? Compared to other popular operating systems, this is certainly true, but if you dig deeper into the Android architecture, difficulties and questions arise. Many praise Android for its openness and the ability to replace and customize firmware to fit its needs. This post is about the consequences of my decision. What reasons made me do this, I won’t write, but I’ll add only that I was not going to upload the program on Google Play and didn’t plan to make money on it in any other way. Exactly a year ago, I decided to write a custom locker (lock screen) for my old Samsung Galaxy Gio in the style of the then popular Samsung Galaxy s3. Hello to habrastarozhilam from habranovichka.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |